|
RACH:
I just got this suggestion for a Magen debate:
'Is Magen in FZY overly concerned with external hasbara when
we should be focusing on mending Israel from within. Or is the
existential threat to Israel's legitimacy from abroad too important
to not focus on?'
- but
what on earth is that meant to mean?
LAUREN:
I took it to be asking whether or not we should be focussing
on explaining and defending the matzav in Israel to those who
hold an overtly negative opinion based upon biased news, or
whether as Zionists we should concentrate on healing the problems
within Israel...
RACH: Hmmmm,
how interesting. Its amazing how from reading the same sentences
we can both look at it from such different perspectives. I personally
thought it was more concerned with aliyah and whether it would
be an ideal situation if everyone theoretically was to make
aliyah - or is it necessary to keep some 'magen-mouths' behind
in the diaspora?
LAUREN:
Good thing there are two of us - we can cover all aspects of
magen this way! So let us answer both questions. I believe that
ultimately the future of the Jewish people belongs in the Land
of Israel. However, realistically this would be a very long
term ideal, which may not be achieved for generations. Until
the time that this dream becomes a reality, whilst living in
Galut, we must ensure that all Jews have the right to self-determination.
This includes the right to call themselves Zionists without
being deemed racist. For as long as there is a diaspora, hasbara
must be in place, possibly as much as an internal focus upon
Israel???
RACH: The
whole discussion of whether all the Jews should move to Israel,
I believe should be saved for another time - we could be here
all week if we continue with it
. As for the question you
posed, I most definitely believe that hasbara and the diaspora
go hand in hand. Magen is defence of Jewish rights, therefore
surely the activism and awareness we can raise inside the diaspora
is more important than what can be done in Israel. There is
no 'possibly' about it.
LAUREN:
Ok! Point taken!! Just one more thing on this issue -from the
end of the Second World War, with the world discovering the
atrocities of the Shoah, it became generally frowned upon to
express anti-semitism. However, sixty years on, threats to Jewish
communities, such as those on continental Europe, have massively
increased. This I believe is intrinsically linked to growing
anti-Zionist sentiment, which goes further than disagreeing
with Israeli governmental decisions, but questions the legitimacy
of the state itself and deems the Jewish people declaring themselves
as a nation, to be racist. *breathe* Therefore, I would say
external hasbara is indeed too important to ignore.
RACH: I
don't think the question is whether we are ignoring it, I think
it is just a matter of where our priorities lie. Once again,
would you believe twice in one evening, I agree with you! Although
not in all cases
.. it is important to state I believe
anti- semitism is not anti-zionism (exemplified by the BNP!)
although more and more we are moving in the direction where
they are no doubt being twisted and tangled together (but we
will save that for another time).
Moving on
..its
all very well us saying we should be active within Israel but
in reality what are the practicalities of it?
LAUREN:
Wow - I'm in shock - agree with me?!! Although I love a good
debate I'll ignore the whole anti-zionism versus anti-semitism
malarkey! To be honest, one can't do as much from Manchester
(or wherever else in the diaspora) as one could do whilst living
within Israeli society. However, the beauty of FZY is that we
take chanichim and educate them about their Zionist heritage
and show them Israel, introducing each person to a plethora
of issues and debates. The FZY bogrim are there to create a
positive dugma on how to be active and do as much as possible
for the Jewish people as a nation and our own homeland. It is
for bogrim to create this dugma whilst living in the diaspora,
and then to ultimately fulfil our ideology by making aliyah
and continuing our magen ideals whilst living the dream.
RACH: In
conclusion, I think one point we can take from this is that
we both have very different views on varying aspects of magen.
'Tis good to have a healthy discussion every now and then!!
There are many ways we can be active and be ambassadors to Israel
and in this day it is most definitely imperative that we do
so. Join the debate at www.fzy.org.uk/interact
- be interactive! Send any hate mail to Lauren! Cheers.
LAUREN:
Oy!

|